Discussion:
Notes for 35ABF09 (Cremains of the Day) and 35ABF01 repeat
(too old to reply)
Matt Garvey
2024-04-22 00:39:51 UTC
Permalink
Hmm, odd one. Nice try with the concept, even if the reason for the trip
was really forced, but the rifts and bickering and everything didn't
seem to have even as much justification. Nothing really connected or
paid off. The reveal about the true meaning of the waterfall was cute
though.

And last week's second airing of 35ABF01 on April 14 left out the
original's dedication to Istvan Majoros. The original may have been
timed slightly differently near the end of the credits, as its final
vocal ended before the dedication, but in this "regular" version, it
carries over into the Gracie logo.
MummyChunk
2024-04-23 11:28:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Garvey
Hmm, odd one. Nice try with the concept, even if the reason for th
trip
Post by Matt Garvey
was really forced, but the rifts and bickering and everythin
didn't
Post by Matt Garvey
seem to have even as much justification. Nothing really connecte
or
Post by Matt Garvey
paid off. The reveal about the true meaning of the waterfall wa
cute
Post by Matt Garvey
though
And last week's second airing of 35ABF01 on April 14 left out the
original's dedication to Istvan Majoros. The original may have bee
timed slightly differently near the end of the credits, as it
final
Post by Matt Garvey
vocal ended before the dedication, but in this "regular
version, it
Post by Matt Garvey
carries over into the Gracie logo
Exactly why do they mak
these changes from the original versions


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=664022862#66402286
Matt Garvey
2024-05-06 00:53:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Garvey
Post by Matt Garvey
Hmm, odd one. Nice try with the concept, even if the reason for the
trip
Post by Matt Garvey
was really forced, but the rifts and bickering and everything
didn't
Post by Matt Garvey
seem to have even as much justification. Nothing really connected
or
Post by Matt Garvey
paid off. The reveal about the true meaning of the waterfall was
cute
Post by Matt Garvey
though.
And last week's second airing of 35ABF01 on April 14 left out the
original's dedication to Istvan Majoros. The original may have been
timed slightly differently near the end of the credits, as its
final
Post by Matt Garvey
vocal ended before the dedication, but in this "regular"
version, it
Post by Matt Garvey
carries over into the Gracie logo.
Exactly why do they make
these changes from the original versions?
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=664022862#664022862
As far as I can tell, in most cases it's that the original airings are
themselves changed from the normal/standard/canonical version of the
episodes, except of course when it's a rerun getting a dedication wedged
in because it couldn't wait. Almost no dedications (out of the dozens
that have now aired over the years) have "stuck" permanently, and it's
really a shame, especially in the latter case when not nearly as many
people would be watching.

The best way to view it (if not the best way to conceptualize it!), I
suppose, is that the broadcast itself is "in loving memory" of the
person. I'd vastly prefer it if each such episode stayed dedicated
forever, in all incarnations, the way a book or film is dedicated to
people or in honor of the recently deceased.
MummyChunk
2024-05-06 22:16:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Garvey
Post by Matt Garvey
Hmm, odd one. Nice try with the concept, even if the reason fo
th
Post by Matt Garvey
Post by Matt Garvey
tri
was really forced, but the rifts and bickering and everythin
didn'
seem to have even as much justification. Nothing reall
connecte
Post by Matt Garvey
Post by Matt Garvey
o
paid off. The reveal about the true meaning of the waterfall wa
cut
though
And last week's second airing of 35ABF01 on April 14 left ou
th
Post by Matt Garvey
Post by Matt Garvey
original's dedication to Istvan Majoros. The original may hav
bee
Post by Matt Garvey
Post by Matt Garvey
timed slightly differently near the end of the credits, as it
fina
vocal ended before the dedication, but in thi
"regular
Post by Matt Garvey
Post by Matt Garvey
version, i
carries over into the Gracie logo
Exactly why do they mak
these changes from the original versions
This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=664022862#66402286
As far as I can tell, in most cases it's that the original airing
are
Post by Matt Garvey
themselves changed from the normal/standard/canonical version o
the
Post by Matt Garvey
episodes, except of course when it's a rerun getting a dedicatio
wedged
Post by Matt Garvey
in because it couldn't wait. Almost no dedications (out of th
dozens
Post by Matt Garvey
that have now aired over the years) have "stuck
permanently, and it's
Post by Matt Garvey
really a shame, especially in the latter case when not nearly a
many
Post by Matt Garvey
people would be watching
The best way to view it (if not the best way to conceptualize it!)
I
Post by Matt Garvey
suppose, is that the broadcast itself is "in lovin
memory" of the
Post by Matt Garvey
person. I'd vastly prefer it if each such episode stayed dedicate
forever, in all incarnations, the way a book or film is dedicate
to
Post by Matt Garvey
people or in honor of the recently deceased
I agree completely. Seems like just creating additional work fo
someone to change it from the original right? But no reason to remov
something that was important at the time of the original airing.
Maybe someone should be given some feedback about this


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=664022862#66402286

Loading...